angelfire76
05-29 10:13 PM
haha,..too funny...wrt I-94..
how much was the fee for paris T visa?
60 Euros. Same price as a short term Schengen visa. So if you can get a short term Schengen visa (the consulates are empty in the US FYI) visit some places in Europe as part of a layover (ironically cheaper to get 2 tickets instead of a transfer) and then travel to India. Skip duty free in Europe as it's price gouging.
how much was the fee for paris T visa?
60 Euros. Same price as a short term Schengen visa. So if you can get a short term Schengen visa (the consulates are empty in the US FYI) visit some places in Europe as part of a layover (ironically cheaper to get 2 tickets instead of a transfer) and then travel to India. Skip duty free in Europe as it's price gouging.
wallpaper Anime Spring Love Couple
eb3_nepa
05-26 03:10 PM
Just send
1. Complete apllication
2.2 Photographs
3. Copy of I-485 reciept
4. Copy Last advance Parole
5. Check.
Thats it.
MC
Thanks for replying MC. One more question. Can I send one combined check for my spouse and me?
1. Complete apllication
2.2 Photographs
3. Copy of I-485 reciept
4. Copy Last advance Parole
5. Check.
Thats it.
MC
Thanks for replying MC. One more question. Can I send one combined check for my spouse and me?
qvadis
03-21 04:48 AM
Allow me to emphasize a different section of the text:
Snips from Nov 05 Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2712.html)
The AC21 removed the per-country limit in any calendar quarter in which overall applicant demand for Employment-based visa numbers is less than the total of such numbers available.
>> As per my understanding, When there are no per country limits, It can be assigned to any one with oldest PD. Not that it is working like that with USCIS. As I said, before in my previous post, we can imagine these visa numbers tagged with the category name beside them. <<
The way I read this is that this particular AC21 rule only applies if there are no cut-off dates in any category (for that calendar quarter). This is clearly not the case in this bulletin, where the cut-off date for EB3 is set to July '05. Hence, the new interpretation seems different.
During FY due to anticipated heavy demand, the AC21 provisions are not expected to apply ...] This will mean an Employment per-country limit for FY-2006 of approximately 10,650.
To illustrate the effect of the reduced per-county limitation during FY-2006 on the oversubscribed countries, it should be noted that during FY-2005 India used approximately 47,175 Employment numbers.
>> I have spoken with an attorney and he expressed above similar opinion where we might not have noticed how numbers were overflowing and NOT overflowing to demand or lack of demand. Either way, This is not a panacea for the problem at hand as there is no clarity what so ever in either procedures. <<
Maybe I'm misreading above statement, but it sounds to me that because of higher demand (of ROW), AC21 wouldn't apply anymore, and instead of 47k in '05, India had only received 10k in '06.
Note that I think the immigration system is broken and needs to be fixed. By changing their interpretation, they are only taking away visas from one group and give it to another group. I can certainly see why people who are affected by this would be biased. No harm intended.
Snips from Nov 05 Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2712.html)
The AC21 removed the per-country limit in any calendar quarter in which overall applicant demand for Employment-based visa numbers is less than the total of such numbers available.
>> As per my understanding, When there are no per country limits, It can be assigned to any one with oldest PD. Not that it is working like that with USCIS. As I said, before in my previous post, we can imagine these visa numbers tagged with the category name beside them. <<
The way I read this is that this particular AC21 rule only applies if there are no cut-off dates in any category (for that calendar quarter). This is clearly not the case in this bulletin, where the cut-off date for EB3 is set to July '05. Hence, the new interpretation seems different.
During FY due to anticipated heavy demand, the AC21 provisions are not expected to apply ...] This will mean an Employment per-country limit for FY-2006 of approximately 10,650.
To illustrate the effect of the reduced per-county limitation during FY-2006 on the oversubscribed countries, it should be noted that during FY-2005 India used approximately 47,175 Employment numbers.
>> I have spoken with an attorney and he expressed above similar opinion where we might not have noticed how numbers were overflowing and NOT overflowing to demand or lack of demand. Either way, This is not a panacea for the problem at hand as there is no clarity what so ever in either procedures. <<
Maybe I'm misreading above statement, but it sounds to me that because of higher demand (of ROW), AC21 wouldn't apply anymore, and instead of 47k in '05, India had only received 10k in '06.
Note that I think the immigration system is broken and needs to be fixed. By changing their interpretation, they are only taking away visas from one group and give it to another group. I can certainly see why people who are affected by this would be biased. No harm intended.
2011 by missbroken in aMiziNg
amitjoey
05-20 01:20 PM
The total is $2100.
Thanks a lot sunnymit and sriteam
Thanks a lot sunnymit and sriteam
more...
franklin
09-07 02:19 AM
Got IV tshirt?
Check!
Got plane ticket?
Check!
Got hotel?
Check!
Got motivation?
Check!
Got the will to make a change?
Check!
Got greencard?
...
Check!
Got plane ticket?
Check!
Got hotel?
Check!
Got motivation?
Check!
Got the will to make a change?
Check!
Got greencard?
...
JunRN
09-12 12:07 PM
For me it's simple. My test case is HR5882. I have seen that Democrats fully supported the bill while Republicans are trying to stall it.
I can predict that Democrat will help us. It was during the time of Clinton when immigration into the US was easy. Visa Bulletin was almost always current. AC21 was passed during the time of Clinton, a democrat.
So, tell me. What Republican bill was passed that supports legal immigrants?
I can predict that Democrat will help us. It was during the time of Clinton when immigration into the US was easy. Visa Bulletin was almost always current. AC21 was passed during the time of Clinton, a democrat.
So, tell me. What Republican bill was passed that supports legal immigrants?
more...
av2004
06-25 04:29 PM
I have also made the call and the lady asked me whether I was supportive of the bills and where I am calling from.
Way to go IV!
Way to go IV!
2010 I love the way you make me
neeidd
03-05 02:24 AM
Why do they need money to respond to RTI request. IF they don't have a program, its their job to comeup with one. They shouldnot/cannot go asking for money.
Sounds like a scam.
Perhaps this should be brought to attention of Secretary of State or President.
If you have a copy, lets go to press with that.
I am happy to pay $25 for this cause
Sounds like a scam.
Perhaps this should be brought to attention of Secretary of State or President.
If you have a copy, lets go to press with that.
I am happy to pay $25 for this cause
more...
tdasara
07-20 03:10 PM
And look what our desi reporters write
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1779190.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1779190.cms
hair Anime love: text, images,
Openarms
03-05 11:02 AM
Not so fast buddy. We are not on forums 24/7
The thread was posted last night and how can you expect instant reply.:D
In future if someone wants to reach us if you have any question, it is better to directly contact us rather than posting on the forum as we do not read every post.
A couple of people who got the letters have already emailed us and let us all review the letter to see if we are getting what we need from this request. Let us all agree if we want to pursue this and contribute towards this. Once we have enough people, we can go forward.
This is one of the positive steps that we have taken here and glad that we got the response from CIS. So now IV needs to get expose this letter as public as possible to get the USCIS tactics out (senate, congress, president, dhs head and all in the world). And if need be that we all need to contribute to the money they are asking. This is the good one.
The thread was posted last night and how can you expect instant reply.:D
In future if someone wants to reach us if you have any question, it is better to directly contact us rather than posting on the forum as we do not read every post.
A couple of people who got the letters have already emailed us and let us all review the letter to see if we are getting what we need from this request. Let us all agree if we want to pursue this and contribute towards this. Once we have enough people, we can go forward.
This is one of the positive steps that we have taken here and glad that we got the response from CIS. So now IV needs to get expose this letter as public as possible to get the USCIS tactics out (senate, congress, president, dhs head and all in the world). And if need be that we all need to contribute to the money they are asking. This is the good one.
more...
hebbar77
04-16 06:35 PM
I guess irrespective of which loc u get services from, they are louzy people. I had terrible experience with them. They take their own time to do anything(all counted in months). If you dont keep checking what happened to ur petition, its highly likely that files went into some waste bin!
But this helps employers, as does slow emmigration processing.
Though we have number power, all of us are helpless when it comes to lawyers.
Beggars are not choosers!!
BTW Paul hastings has been RESEARCHING for PD substition for me for last 3-4 months. So it looks all lawfirms are as good as another!
But this helps employers, as does slow emmigration processing.
Though we have number power, all of us are helpless when it comes to lawyers.
Beggars are not choosers!!
BTW Paul hastings has been RESEARCHING for PD substition for me for last 3-4 months. So it looks all lawfirms are as good as another!
hot Currently in love with ANIME♥
gk_2000
03-28 09:11 PM
I was referring to your clandestine negative comment.
I thought that was straight to the point, as you started using expletive. According to our friend MC, to be a man you must behave like this. I disagree with him, so I expressed this view, so people can behave like gentlemen and not cavemen.
To MC, Through all this, I personally mean you no insult.. it is just your attitude and I have been lecturing you a lot on that lately, only on that.
I thought that was straight to the point, as you started using expletive. According to our friend MC, to be a man you must behave like this. I disagree with him, so I expressed this view, so people can behave like gentlemen and not cavemen.
To MC, Through all this, I personally mean you no insult.. it is just your attitude and I have been lecturing you a lot on that lately, only on that.
more...
house 2011 anime love quotes. anime
injrav
05-17 08:11 PM
sent emails as per forum guidelines
I like the Email interface and thanks to all who created this one
I like the Email interface and thanks to all who created this one
tattoo Can love overcome the past?
glus
07-05 07:31 AM
I Feel that what USCIS will do next is not return any application back to sender but DUMP them in some backlog storage room like BEC center and people hAVE TO WAIT FOR NEXT YEAR VB in OCTOBER IN ORDER TO GET RECEIPT NUMBER BASED ON PD AND THEN THEY WILL GET EAD and AP. The only thing is one might save on INCREASE 485 FEES:eek:
I don't think uscis can do that. They can either accept applications or reject them. If they hold the applications for next 3 months, they would violate their long-term procedures and would fear a lawsuit because of that. They know that they are original documents in those applications that can be used once again...god knows when...
I don't think uscis can do that. They can either accept applications or reject them. If they hold the applications for next 3 months, they would violate their long-term procedures and would fear a lawsuit because of that. They know that they are original documents in those applications that can be used once again...god knows when...
more...
pictures Anime Album: Love Is In The
Jaime
05-30 06:22 PM
Let's go to churches and temples and pray that this amendment passes.
dresses cute anime couples in love.
GCBy3000
11-09 10:16 AM
I did not see the list till now and this link helped me. There is no offense in putting this link here to show others who are not aware of.
Jimmi smarty.
tell us something new. it is all available in CNN or anywhere, everybody knows That.
Go back to sleep now.
Jimmi smarty.
tell us something new. it is all available in CNN or anywhere, everybody knows That.
Go back to sleep now.
more...
makeup Couple.png love anime
simple1
09-28 05:43 PM
dont claim uei, it is for gc and citizens only.
All,
I was laid off and since then I have been receiving my unemploment insurance from state of texas. I have my EAD and have been actively looking for a job. Now there is a family emergency and I have to go to india. Is it legal to claim my employment insurance from india? Will there be any problem if I claim my benefits from india?
All,
I was laid off and since then I have been receiving my unemploment insurance from state of texas. I have my EAD and have been actively looking for a job. Now there is a family emergency and I have to go to india. Is it legal to claim my employment insurance from india? Will there be any problem if I claim my benefits from india?
girlfriend anime love
Macaca
09-12 02:56 PM
It's always
too early
to quit
Norman Vincent Peale
too early
to quit
Norman Vincent Peale
hairstyles in love anime images. anime
sujith1
04-10 03:27 PM
Please PM me if you are interested in the Identity Management consulting arena based off Dallas/VA/Seattle
nat23
06-26 02:09 PM
i thought a simple majority i.e. >50 would make the bill pass through senate. is that not true?
Nope. Need 60 votes to do anything in Senate and that is why even though the Dems have a so called majority then cant get anything done.
Nope. Need 60 votes to do anything in Senate and that is why even though the Dems have a so called majority then cant get anything done.
nousername
06-30 12:59 PM
FYI..
I received my second AP renewal within 30 days of filing. It was paper based filing. In the process I lost 2 1/2 months of my previous AP approval, which was valid till August '09.
Seems like they are processing AP very quickly.
I received my second AP renewal within 30 days of filing. It was paper based filing. In the process I lost 2 1/2 months of my previous AP approval, which was valid till August '09.
Seems like they are processing AP very quickly.
No comments:
Post a Comment